FDA inspection tomorrow.
Are your batch records complete, searchable, and ready in 30 seconds?

1,578 FDA observations on dietary supplement manufacturers in 2024 up 46% in one year. The top three findings: incomplete batch records, unverified supplier COAs, insufficient component identity testing. All three are directly automatable. We automate them. Your QM signs off.

No sales call. Send us 3 supplier COA PDFs → automated pass/flag verification → delivered within 48 hours.

No sales call.

Describe your workflow →

response within 24 hours.

Serving compliance-heavy operations in:

BPR Pre-PopulationCOA Supplier VerificationLot Dossier IndexingLabel Compliance CheckSupplier FSVP TrackingFinished Product COADeviation / CAPA RoutingBrand Client Portal
BPR Pre-PopulationCOA Supplier VerificationLot Dossier IndexingLabel Compliance CheckSupplier FSVP TrackingFinished Product COADeviation / CAPA RoutingBrand Client Portal

Why cGMP Manufacturers Use FDAReady

We automate the documentation. Your QM keeps the authority.

Four weeks from "interested" to "this is working." A CMO running 50 batches per month that automates COA verification and BPR pre-population recovers 75+ hours every month — enough QA bandwidth to onboard 10 new brand clients without adding headcount.

Proof before payment.

Send us 3 supplier COA PDFs and the corresponding batch record. We return the automated verification — pass/flag results — within 48 hours. You compare it to what you would have caught manually. We invoice only when it works on your actual documents.

We don't build dashboards.

COA-against-MMR verification engines. BPR pre-population from your Master Manufacturing Record. Lot-indexed dossier search for FDA inspections. Automated COA generation for your brand clients. The difference shows in week two — and on your next Form 483.

Your formulas never leave your facility.

Every automation runs in your environment or a dedicated isolated tenant. We sign NDA + Data Processing Agreement before touching any batch record or supplier COA. Your production data never touches shared infrastructure. No exceptions.

W1
Free Process AuditWe map the workflow, identify the highest-ROI automation. No commitment. NDA available.
W2–3
POC BuildWe build a Proof Of Concept on your real data. You test it.
W4
ValidationYou confirm it works. We iterate if needed.
M2+
RetainerWe invoice, maintain, and expand. Only if you're satisfied.

No sales call. Describe your workflow → response within 24 hours → free analysis sent by email.

No sales call.

Describe your workflow →

response within 24 hours.

Who We Serve

We work with nutraceutical contract manufacturers. One standard: the automation handles the documents. Your QM handles the decisions.

Batch records by lot. Supplier COAs by ingredient. FDA dossiers by inspection date. One CMO managing compliance for 20 to 60 brand clients. Select a workflow below to see what we automate.

scroll
A — BPR Pre-Population
Production order in. MMR-filled batch record out. QM verifies and signs. Never builds from scratch.
At each new lot, the QA manager opens a Word or Excel template and manually copies lot number, quantities, assigned raw materials, and operator parameters from the Master Manufacturing Record. Subpart I of 21 CFR Part 111 requires every BPR to align with the MMR. FDA cites firms frequently for missing or inconsistent entries.
Production order
MMR extraction
Auto-fill BPR fields
QM review & sign
9/10Automatisability
45–90 min → 10 minPer batch
$2,400–4,900Monthly savings (50 batches)
21 CFR Part 111 — Subpart IQM retains full sign-off authority
B — COA Supplier Verification
120 supplier COAs per month. Each compared against your MMR specs in 8 seconds. QA sees flags only.
Every incoming ingredient arrives with a COA PDF in the supplier's own format. AWS Textract extracts analytical parameters — identity, purity, heavy metals, microbiology, moisture. Specialized AI compares them against your MMR specifications for that component. Result: pass or flag. Your QA manager reviews only the exceptions — never the stack.
Supplier COA PDF
AWS Textract extraction
MMR spec comparison
Pass / Flag result
9/10Automatisability
8 secPer COA (vs 20–30 min)
$2,600–3,900Monthly savings
21 CFR Part 111 — Subpart EQA manager reviews all flagged items
C — Lot Dossier Indexing
FDA walks in Tuesday. Lot #A2341 complete dossier: ready in 30 seconds.
When an FDA investigator requests the complete record for a lot, manual search across shared drives, lab emails, and ERP takes 45–90 minutes. Vector indexing of all documents by lot number changes this to a 30-second search. Every BPR, supplier COA, in-process check, and deviation report — indexed as they are created.
BPR · COAs · In-process checks
Smart Automation ingestion
Vector indexing (Supabase)
Lot search in <30 sec
10/10Automatisability
<30 secvs 45–90 min manual
$10–50MCost of a CMO recall
FDA 483 — Observation #1 (2024)Risk avoidance — not billable hours
D — Label Compliance Check
Supplement Facts Panel, allergens, structure/function claims — automated review per 21 CFR 101.36.
Label errors lead to FDA warning letters, recalls, or legal consequences. Specialized AI reviews the artwork PDF against a hard-coded checklist: Supplement Facts Panel format, nutrient order, correct DVs, structure/function claim language, allergen declarations, §403(r)(6) disclaimer. Compliance report with specific items to correct.
Label artwork PDF
21 CFR 101.36 checklist
Structure/function review
Compliance report
7/10Automatisability
2–4h → 20 minPer new SKU
15–20 SKUs/yrTypical new formulation volume
21 CFR Part 101.36 — LabelingQA reviews before brand client approval
E — Supplier FSVP Tracking
30 supplier files. All qualification statuses, audit dates, and expiry alerts — maintained automatically.
The Foreign Supplier Verification Program (21 CFR Part 1, Subpart L) requires massive documentation: supplier audits, COA history, certifications, renewals. A CMO sourcing 30–50 ingredients has 30–50 supplier files to maintain continuously. Tyche Industries received a warning letter in February 2025 for failing to correctly test incoming raw materials.
Supplier registry
Supabase per-supplier DB
J-90/60/30 expiry alerts
FSVP monthly report
8/10Automatisability
8h/mo → 1hManual tracking eliminated
Feb 2025Tyche Industries warning letter
21 CFR Part 1 — Subpart L (FSVP)Initial supplier data entry required
F — Finished Product COA
Lab results received. Brand-formatted COA assembled in 5 minutes. QM signs.
Once lab results arrive for the finished product, the QM manually assembles the client COA: batch header, parameter table, pass/fail status, signature. 45–60 minutes per batch. On 50 batches per month: 37–50 hours of QM time on pure document assembly. Each brand client has a different format. We generate every format automatically.
Lab results received
Auto-assemble COA
Brand format mapping
QM sign-off
8/10Automatisability
45–60 min → 5 minPer batch
$2,400–3,250Monthly savings
21 CFR Part 111 — COA generationQM retains product release authority
G — Deviation / CAPA Routing
OOS result detected. Deviation form pre-filled, routed to QM, escalation timer started.
Component identity testing violations jumped from zero in 2023 to 66 observations in 2024. Each OOS result triggers an investigation that must be documented, routed to the QM, and closed within a defined timeline. This process is currently diffuse — email, verbal, or post-it. When Process B detects an OOS, Smart Automation routes it automatically with a pre-filled deviation form.
OOS flag from Process B
Smart Automation routing
Pre-filled deviation form
QM investigation & close
7/10Automatisability
0 → 66FDA OOS observations 2023→2024
TraceableComplete OOS audit trail
21 CFR Part 111 — CAPAQM closes all deviation investigations
H — Brand Client Portal
Brand clients log in, type the lot number, download COA + batch summary. Zero QM time.
Brand clients request COAs, batch records, and compliance certificates by email to the QM. Large brands (Amazon, Target) require self-service supplier portals. Mid-size CMOs don't have them. Each incoming request is 15–30 minutes of QM search + response time. A simple Supabase + frontend portal eliminates this entirely — and becomes a premium feature in your RFPs.
Brand client login
Lot number lookup
Supabase document retrieval
COA + batch summary download
9/10Automatisability
5–10h/mo → 0QM time on document requests
Premium featureSellable in CMO RFPs
Brand client self-serviceFrontend customizable per brand
A — BPR Pre-Population
Production order in. MMR-filled batch record out. QM verifies and signs. Never builds from scratch.
At each new lot, the QA manager opens a Word or Excel template and manually copies lot number, quantities, assigned raw materials, and operator parameters from the Master Manufacturing Record. Subpart I of 21 CFR Part 111 requires every BPR to align with the MMR. FDA cites firms frequently for missing or inconsistent entries.
Production order
MMR extraction
Auto-fill BPR fields
QM review & sign
9/10Automatisability
45–90 min → 10 minPer batch
$2,400–4,900Monthly savings (50 batches)
21 CFR Part 111 — Subpart IQM retains full sign-off authority
B — COA Supplier Verification
120 supplier COAs per month. Each compared against your MMR specs in 8 seconds. QA sees flags only.
Every incoming ingredient arrives with a COA PDF in the supplier's own format. AWS Textract extracts analytical parameters — identity, purity, heavy metals, microbiology, moisture. Specialized AI compares them against your MMR specifications for that component. Result: pass or flag. Your QA manager reviews only the exceptions — never the stack.
Supplier COA PDF
AWS Textract extraction
MMR spec comparison
Pass / Flag result
9/10Automatisability
8 secPer COA (vs 20–30 min)
$2,600–3,900Monthly savings
21 CFR Part 111 — Subpart EQA manager reviews all flagged items
C — Lot Dossier Indexing
FDA walks in Tuesday. Lot #A2341 complete dossier: ready in 30 seconds.
When an FDA investigator requests the complete record for a lot, manual search across shared drives, lab emails, and ERP takes 45–90 minutes. Vector indexing of all documents by lot number changes this to a 30-second search. Every BPR, supplier COA, in-process check, and deviation report — indexed as they are created.
BPR · COAs · In-process checks
Smart Automation ingestion
Vector indexing (Supabase)
Lot search in <30 sec
10/10Automatisability
<30 secvs 45–90 min manual
$10–50MCost of a CMO recall
FDA 483 — Observation #1 (2024)Risk avoidance — not billable hours
D — Label Compliance Check
Supplement Facts Panel, allergens, structure/function claims — automated review per 21 CFR 101.36.
Label errors lead to FDA warning letters, recalls, or legal consequences. Specialized AI reviews the artwork PDF against a hard-coded checklist: Supplement Facts Panel format, nutrient order, correct DVs, structure/function claim language, allergen declarations, §403(r)(6) disclaimer. Compliance report with specific items to correct.
Label artwork PDF
21 CFR 101.36 checklist
Structure/function review
Compliance report
7/10Automatisability
2–4h → 20 minPer new SKU
15–20 SKUs/yrTypical new formulation volume
21 CFR Part 101.36 — LabelingQA reviews before brand client approval
E — Supplier FSVP Tracking
30 supplier files. All qualification statuses, audit dates, and expiry alerts — maintained automatically.
The Foreign Supplier Verification Program (21 CFR Part 1, Subpart L) requires massive documentation: supplier audits, COA history, certifications, renewals. A CMO sourcing 30–50 ingredients has 30–50 supplier files to maintain continuously. Tyche Industries received a warning letter in February 2025 for failing to correctly test incoming raw materials.
Supplier registry
Supabase per-supplier DB
J-90/60/30 expiry alerts
FSVP monthly report
8/10Automatisability
8h/mo → 1hManual tracking eliminated
Feb 2025Tyche Industries warning letter
21 CFR Part 1 — Subpart L (FSVP)Initial supplier data entry required
F — Finished Product COA
Lab results received. Brand-formatted COA assembled in 5 minutes. QM signs.
Once lab results arrive for the finished product, the QM manually assembles the client COA: batch header, parameter table, pass/fail status, signature. 45–60 minutes per batch. On 50 batches per month: 37–50 hours of QM time on pure document assembly. Each brand client has a different format. We generate every format automatically.
Lab results received
Auto-assemble COA
Brand format mapping
QM sign-off
8/10Automatisability
45–60 min → 5 minPer batch
$2,400–3,250Monthly savings
21 CFR Part 111 — COA generationQM retains product release authority
G — Deviation / CAPA Routing
OOS result detected. Deviation form pre-filled, routed to QM, escalation timer started.
Component identity testing violations jumped from zero in 2023 to 66 observations in 2024. Each OOS result triggers an investigation that must be documented, routed to the QM, and closed within a defined timeline. This process is currently diffuse — email, verbal, or post-it. When Process B detects an OOS, Smart Automation routes it automatically with a pre-filled deviation form.
OOS flag from Process B
Smart Automation routing
Pre-filled deviation form
QM investigation & close
7/10Automatisability
0 → 66FDA OOS observations 2023→2024
TraceableComplete OOS audit trail
21 CFR Part 111 — CAPAQM closes all deviation investigations
H — Brand Client Portal
Brand clients log in, type the lot number, download COA + batch summary. Zero QM time.
Brand clients request COAs, batch records, and compliance certificates by email to the QM. Large brands (Amazon, Target) require self-service supplier portals. Mid-size CMOs don't have them. Each incoming request is 15–30 minutes of QM search + response time. A simple Supabase + frontend portal eliminates this entirely — and becomes a premium feature in your RFPs.
Brand client login
Lot number lookup
Supabase document retrieval
COA + batch summary download
9/10Automatisability
5–10h/mo → 0QM time on document requests
Premium featureSellable in CMO RFPs
Brand client self-serviceFrontend customizable per brand

The Real Cost

75 hours of QA documentation every month. That's not an efficiency problem. That's a growth ceiling.

Your Quality Manager the one who knows 21 CFR Part 111 backwards is spending Tuesday morning comparing supplier COA values to MMR specs by hand. On the 40th PDF of the month. Human attention flags long before the stack does. The FDA has seen this: component identity testing violations jumped from zero in 2023 to 66 observations in 2024. Your QM's name is on every one of those records.

Your Quality Manager the one who knows 21 CFR Part 111 backwards is spending Tuesday morning comparing supplier COA values to MMR specs by hand. On the 40th PDF of the month. Human attention flags long before the stack does. The FDA has seen this: component identity testing violations jumped from zero in 2023 to 66 observations in 2024. Your QM's name is on every one of those records.

A — BPR Pre-Population
45–90 min10 min
Production order → MMR-filled batch record. QM verifies and signs only.
B — COA Verification
20–30 min8 sec
Every supplier COA compared against MMR specs automatically — pass or flag.
C — Lot Dossier Search
45–90 min<30 sec
Any lot — batch record, COAs, in-process checks — indexed and instantly searchable.

No sales call. Describe your workflow → response within 24 hours → free analysis sent by email.

No sales call.

Describe your workflow →

response within 24 hours.

What We Build

Eight automatable workflows. One QA operation that scales without adding headcount.

From supplier COA ingestion to FDA-ready lot dossier — including BPR pre-population that runs the moment a production order is created. Every automation is monitored, documented, and maintained. If it breaks on a Tuesday at 11pm, we know before your QA team does.

card-background

Supplier COA Verification

Every supplier COA compared against your MMR specifications automatically — identity, purity, heavy metals, microbiology, moisture. Result in 8 seconds: pass or flag. Your QA manager sees exceptions, not every document. No more 4-hour PDF comparison sessions on Monday morning.

card-background

Supplier COA Verification

Every supplier COA compared against your MMR specifications automatically — identity, purity, heavy metals, microbiology, moisture. Result in 8 seconds: pass or flag. Your QA manager sees exceptions, not every document. No more 4-hour PDF comparison sessions on Monday morning.

card-background

Lot Dossier Search

class FDADossier:
lot = "LOT-2024-0847"
scope = ["batch_rec", "COA", "deviations", "IPC"]
def retrieve(self):
return db.search(

Index every batch record, supplier COA, in-process check, and deviation report — searchable by lot number, ingredient, or date. When FDA walks in, your complete dossier is ready before they finish their opening statement.

card-background

Lot Dossier Search

class FDADossier:
lot = "LOT-2024-0847"
scope = ["batch_rec", "COA", "deviations", "IPC"]
def retrieve(self):
return db.search(

Index every batch record, supplier COA, in-process check, and deviation report — searchable by lot number, ingredient, or date. When FDA walks in, your complete dossier is ready before they finish their opening statement.

card-background

BPR Pre-Population & COA Generation

Trigger

Prompts

Send Email

Production order triggers automatic pre-population of the Batch Production Record from your MMR. Completed-product COA assembled automatically from lab results. Your QM verifies and signs. They don't build from scratch — every batch, every week.

card-background

BPR Pre-Population & COA Generation

Trigger

Prompts

Send Email

Production order triggers automatic pre-population of the Batch Production Record from your MMR. Completed-product COA assembled automatically from lab results. Your QM verifies and signs. They don't build from scratch — every batch, every week.

n8n

n8n

Claude AI (Anthropic)

Claude AI (Anthropic)

Python

Python

AWS Textract

AWS Textract

Vector Indexing

Vector Indexing

21 CFR Part 111

21 CFR Part 111

PDF Generation

PDF Generation

NDA on Request

NDA on Request

About Sumit Ops

A small firm. By design.

A small firm. By design.

FDAreadyai is not a 200-person agency with junior contractors on your account. We are a specialized automation firm working with a limited number of cGMP clients at any time — enough to give each engagement the attention it requires. Every automation is built and maintained by the same people who assessed your documentation in week one. We are based in Wyoming, USA. We work with nutraceutical contract manufacturers across the United States.

FDAreadyai is not a 200-person agency with junior contractors on your account. We are a specialized automation firm working with a limited number of cGMP clients at any time — enough to give each engagement the attention it requires. Every automation is built and maintained by the same people who assessed your documentation in week one. We are based in Wyoming, USA. We work with nutraceutical contract manufacturers across the United States.

Clément

Automation & Systems · Founder

Automation &

Systems · Founder

Joël

Outreach & Client Success · Founder

Outreach & Client

Success · Founder

Common Questions

The questions worth asking before you share a single COA.

Does this require access to our ERP or production systems?

No. For the proof of concept, you upload 3 PDF files to a shared Google Drive folder you create and control. You can revoke access at any time. We never touch your ERP or production systems. If you want deeper integration later, we deploy n8n inside your own network — your data never leaves your infrastructure.

Who is responsible if the system makes a verification error?

Is this compatible with 21 CFR Part 11?

What about our proprietary formulas and intellectual property?

How long before we see real results?

Is my batch record and production data confidential?

Does this require access to our ERP or production systems?

No. For the proof of concept, you upload 3 PDF files to a shared Google Drive folder you create and control. You can revoke access at any time. We never touch your ERP or production systems. If you want deeper integration later, we deploy n8n inside your own network — your data never leaves your infrastructure.

Who is responsible if the system makes a verification error?

Is this compatible with 21 CFR Part 11?

What about our proprietary formulas and intellectual property?

How long before we see real results?

Is my batch record and production data confidential?

© 2026 fdareadyai. All right reserved.

Zero commitment. Real result by week four.

Send us 3 supplier COA PDFs and the corresponding batch record. We return the automated verification — pass/flag results — within 48 hours. No sales call required.

© 2026 Sumit Ops LLC — Wyoming, USA · hello@sumitops.com